US v. Chittenden

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LORENE CHITTENDEN
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Gregory, Jan. 31, 2017,
Sixth Amendment- Pre-trial partial seizure of assets did not deprive the defendant of her right to choose counsel where there was no evidence that she was not able to obtain the representation she desired.
Vacated and remanded by USSC – remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of Honeycutt v. United States, 581 U. S. ___ (2017). Summary here.
Continue reading

Shiflett v. State

JEFFREY MICHAEL SHIFLETT v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals, Nazarian, Sept. 28, 2016,
6th Amendment – Trial Restraint – Giving an unruly defendant the choice of wearing an ankle bracelet that delivers a stun if activated or not participating in his trial was not inappropriate in light of his demeanor
Continue reading

Phillips v. State

RICHMOND D. PHILLIPS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals, Friedman, Filed Oct. 27, 2015,
DNA – Where a DNA sample does not comply with statutory requirements to be automatically admissible, it reverts to the standard requirement of a Frye-Reed hearing

Continue reading