Philip Thomas v. State

PHILIP DANIEL THOMAS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, Raker, November 28, 2018,
Resentencing – If parole eligibility is set by statute, a new sentence that increases the time before a defendant is eligible for parole is an increased sentence that must be justified

Facts:
Thomas was convicted in 2016 of kidnapping, second-degree assault, false imprisonment, driving under the influence, and driving while impaired. He received a total sentence of eighteen years of incarceration as follows: a term of incarceration of fifteen years for kidnapping, three years to be served consecutive to second-degree assault, and one year concurrent for driving under the influence.
In an unreported opinion, the Court of Special Appeals held that assault should have merged into the kidnapping sentence.

Leave a Reply