RICKY HORTON v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Court of Special Appeals, Meredith, Filed Jan. 28, 2016,
Cross-examination – Unless there is a foundation for believing that they have information on the issue, it is not appropriate to ask one witness why another witness might lie.

Cross-examination – Impeachment – It is appropriate to cross-examine a witness about their own motive to testify falsely

Accomplice Testimony – No evidence to support jury instruction regarding accomplice testimony where witness only rode in car with defendant; no evidence that the witness participated in the crime